Some stories never change, which is a case of Aryan scientist that planned to spread anthrax in subway and in that way to wipe out all people in New York.
Two scientists were caught in front of their car that contained 20 million of dollars worth of lab equipment and active anthrax virus. They were caught as they were preparing to go into the desert and do a test to check whether the virus is good enough.
The plan was to set a globe filled with the virus on the tracks in the subway which would have been crushed by train which would cause hundreds of thousand deaths. For more information you could try here. The location was in subway because Harris (scientist) believed that it would shatter the economy, cause havoc and catch the army by surprise. He also said that there were plans to blame Iraqis for the attack.
FBI received a tip by unknown person who told them of the plans those two scientists had. FBI commented that the informant told them that those two scientists are buying equipment from him, and that they are planning to create a weapon. The informant was identified as cancer research scientist Ronald Rockwell. He admitted his involvement is business deal of selling equipment, but denied being the informant.
Only 12 hours after the tip from the informant FBI as well as local authorities found two scientists. People dressed in space-type suits wrapped the car in order to prevent anthrax from poisoning the air. They also sent two scientists to the hospital where they were checked for signs of anthrax of which there were none.
Several charges were brought against these two criminals some of them are conspiracy to acquire lethal toxins which would be used as weapons and the possession of dangerous biological agents. In this case postponed further troubles on Middle-East for several years. He also said that it was rather frightening when you realize that police and FBI had no information about something like this, and only by anonymous informant they were able to stop deaths of hundreds of thousands of New Yorkers.
When you look at Supreme Court and other similar high ranking places you would expect the example on how it should be. But sadly that is not true because diversity in Supreme Court is rather small.
I don’t say it is all bad, if we compare Supreme Court before and after Obama then there is change, but this is still not enough. Before Obama Supreme Court had all white members, which was a type of racial discrimination Obama fixed. An issue of gender diversity is also something Obama changed.
But many other things are left unchanged. For example all judges went to law school at either Yale or Harvard. Each and every member of the Supreme Court comes from coastal state and none of them is Protestant. Only two members of Supreme Court worked as prosecutors, while none of them worked as defense attorney.
All of the things listed above can be considered as one or another type of discrimination.
Duopoly of members regarding their law school is strange and wrong. People that go at either of these schools are expected to perform well, and no one checks whether they are good enough for the position. Other schools have similar level of knowledge, without arrogance that comes from students that went to those two schools.
Religion is important as well. Even though there is a law that punishes religious discrimination, only Catholics and Jews become members of Supreme Court. Religious upbringing gives us different perspectives of right and wrong, and every religion has something to give. Having one “none” (people who have no religion) might be good thing for Supreme Court because it would add another angle in the equation.
Criminal defense lawyer orange county said that lack of members of Supreme Court that had some experience as defense lawyer means that they don’t have insight into costs of procedures and other things for defendant.
A Princeton mentally disturbed graduate who is accused of killing his father, famous hedge funder Thomas Gilbert Senior, will face court.
A court session was supposed to happen on Wednesday, but Junior refused to attend, and he gave no reasons for that, to Court or to his defense lawyer. He only made one rather bizarre request in relation to Cablevision. He asked his lawyer to find and get him in touch with people from Cable Company, but he refused to explain why he needs to speak with them. It is important to know that Junior has a history of different delusions including people speaking with him through television, as he reported it in the past.
Justice Jackson found that Junior is fit to stand the process of trial, and he was supposed to appear in the court on Wednesday for pre-trial update. Justice demanded files and records and info about his mental sickness that is related to the proposed psychiatric defense. But lawyer said that the client isn’t speaking with anyone from defense team and thus there is nothing the lawyer can provide.
About six months ago there was a competency hearing which went through all of the records concerning Junior’s mental health records.
Prosecuting team is aiming at blocking the possibility of psychiatric defense, because it impedes the ability of the prosecuting team to perform their investigation. But that move is impossible because Junior refuses to speak with anyone.
long beach Criminal defense lawyer spoke about this case and he said that whether the prosecutors will have fair trial depends on the defense lawyers. If they refuse to share information Junior gives them, then prosecution is unable to do anything. Whether there is a chance to provide medication to Junior in order to get him back from his delusions was not discussed in the court.
Are you a parent that did not receive physical custody of your child? Watch out new video that addresses the common question of "What general factors are considered when determining visitation?" and remember that www.Lawyers.com is here to help you: goo.gl/tzHTlL... See MoreSee Less
Many divorcing parents are concerned about whether they will receive enough support to cover their children’s expenses, while others worry about being able to make the payments each month. Watch out new www.Lawyers.com Answers video on "How is child support generally calculated?" for great insight on the factors that influence child support payments #divorce ... See MoreSee Less